Skip to main content
Daily Mirror

Man Utd insider lifts lid on Sheikh Jassim after Sir Jim Ratcliffe didn't think he existed

Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani was Sir Jim Ratcliffe's main rival in the race to buy at least some of Manchester United, yet the Qatari banker remains an elusive figure

Sheikh Jassim Bin Hamad Al Thani
Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani pulled out of the race to buy Manchester United last October

The man who oversaw Manchester United's drawn-out sale process has revealed that Sheikh Jassim is indeed real - contrary to Sir Jim Ratcliffe's belief.


Full name Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani, the chairman of Qatar Islamic Bank was in the running to buy United after the Glazer family opened themselves up to offers in November 2022. But barring a handful of images and tidbits of information which drizzled out throughout the 14-month saga, we were told very little about him.


When INEOS chairman Ratcliffe finally completed his £1.3billion deal to acquire a 27.7 per cent stake in the club last month, he joked: "Still nobody's ever seen him, actually. The Glazers never met him.... he never... I'm not sure he exists!"


Joe Ravitch, however, certainly has met the Sheikh and given a glowing review of his personality. Ravitch is a co-founder and partner of Raine Group, the merchant bank given the task of negotiating with interested parties for the Glazers. In an interview with The Times, he revealed: "We met Jassim. He was in New York. He's a lovely guy; a very smart guy.

READ MORE: Ex-Man Utd footballer Bobby Power dies aged 40 as tributes paid to film starREAD MORE: Why Man Utd chiefs were in Barcelona for meeting amid Mason Greenwood transfer pursuit

"The Qataris were very real. They were very smart guys, very thoughtful. I don't know why they didn't appreciate the value [of the club] but we were not their adviser. We tried as the seller to explain the value to them, and they put what they thought was a series of very serious bids on the table.

Ravitch then explained why the Qatari bid - which was for 100 per cent of the club - fell short, as United were valued "around $6.5bn [£5bn]". He added: "I think the Qataris got to about $5.75bn.

Article continues below

"We said to them, 'You're within 10 per cent, why don't you get in a room and try to get to a deal?' But they said no. I think they were very conscious of criticism if they were seen to be overpaying."

Your turn! Would the Qataris have been better owners for Manchester United? Join the debate in the comments section.

Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani
Information about Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al Thani isn't easy to find
Article continues below

Sheikh Jassim reportedly believed that he'd have been a 'dream owner' for United but withdrew from the race last October after the Glazers rejected his final bid. Unlike Ratcliffe and his fellow INEOS chiefs, the son of former Qatari prime minister Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani notably didn't attend face-to-face talks with United last March, instead sending a delegation.

Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Follow Daily Mirror:



Manchester United FCManchester United takeoverSheikh Jassim bin Hamad Al ThaniJim Ratcliffe
reach logo

At Reach and across our entities we and our partners use information collected through cookies and other identifiers from your device to improve experience on our site, analyse how it is used and to show personalised advertising. You can opt out of the saleor sharing of your data, at any time clicking the "Do Not Sell or Share my Data" button at the bottom of the webpage. Please note that your preferences are browser specific. Use of our website and any of our services represents your acceptance of the use of cookies and consent to the practices described in our Privacy Notice and Privacy Notice.