NEWCASTLE United are considering their next move after Crystal Palace rejected their third offer for Marc Guehi - with the Magpies still hopeful of striking a deal for their leading defensive target.
But United have lined up alternative targets in case they're unable to land Guehi, who is understood to be keen on the move to Tyneside.
Newcastle's third bid was believed to be worth in the region of £60m but Palace chairman Steve Parish hinted the offer would be rejected earlier this week when he said: "It's not near the point where we have to make a decision."
Palace are thought to want at least £65m for the England international, with the Magpies now weighing up their next step.
Parish said this week: "Nobody has got to the valuation yet. If you want a superstar player you need to pay superstar money.
"We love having him and would love to keep him. If someone else wants to have him they need to make it really difficult for us. He's a generational talent."
READ MORE:
- New Sandro Tonali Newcastle return game
- Newcastle United formally call off transfer negotiations after failing to agree fee
Guehi himself spoke to the media in the capital this week and insisted his only focus was on Palace's Premier League opener against Brentford this weekend.
And Palace boss Oliver Glasner was asked whether he's resigned to losing Guehi to Newcastle, saying: "There's so many rumours. Not just about Marc. About Joachim Andersen. About [Jordan] Ayew. About [Eberechi] Eze.
"Many rumours and I will be happy when it's September 1. The transfer window is closed. I will go into a pub and have a Guinness and relax."
Newcastle do have other targets in mind, with Howe desperate to add to his backline. Injured pair Sven Botman and Jamaal Lascelles are both facing long spells on the sidelines.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereYou must verify your phone number before you can comment.
Please enter your phone number below, and a verification code will be sent to you by text message.
Please enter the six-digit verification code sent to you by SMS.
Your verification code has been sent a second time to the mobile phone number you provided.
Your verification code has been sent a third time to the mobile phone number you provided.
You have requested your verification code too many times. Please try again later.
Didn’t receive a code? Send it againThe code you entered has not been recognised.
Please try again
You have failed to enter a correct code after three attempts.
Please try again later.
Your phone number has been verified.
Your phone number has been stored with your account details. We will never use it for anything other than verifying that you are the legitimate owner of this account.